How the Ownership of Common Property Works
The
nature of ownership of common property is set out under Section 20 of the Strata
Schemes (Freehold
Section
20 provides:
20
Body Corporate to hold common property as agent for proprietors
The
estate or interest of a body corporate in common property vested in it or acquired
by it shall be held by the body corporate as
agent:
(a)
where the same person or persons is or are the proprietor or proprietors
of all of the lots the subject of the strata scheme concerned – for that proprietor
or those proprietors, or
(b)
where different persons are proprietors of each of two or more of the lots
the subject of the strata scheme concerned – for those proprietors as tenants in common in shares proportional to
the unit entitlements of their respective lots.
A decision
of the NSW Court of Appeal considered the rights of an owner to permit an invitee
to use the common property. These proceedings were an appeal from a decision of
a District Court Judge that an owner be awarded damages for false arrest and false
imprisonment.
The
facts of the case were that a Mr Koumdjiev owned a unit in a strata scheme at Ashfield. One evening, the police were attempting
to return his neighbour Ms Docherty to her unit pursuant to the provisions of the
Intoxicated Persons Act 1979. Mr Koumdjiev
was standing in the entrance foyer of the building.
Ms Docherty asked him not to admit the police, and he refused the police
entry. When the front door was opened
electronically by another occupant of the building, Mr Koumdjiev pushed against
it; however the police succeeded in opening the door.
Mr Koumdjiev was arrested, placed in a police cell, but subsequently acquitted
of charges of resisting police and assault.
The
proceedings concerned the legality of entry into the building by the police but
the decision was important as the Court
was concerned to determine when, if one tenant in common of property purports to
grant permission to another person to enter the property, another tenant in common
might refuse or revoke that permission.
The Court referred to a number of authorities which generally identified
the tension between two incidents of possession: the right to grant or to withhold
permission to others to enter the property, and the right to use the property with
other co-owners (which includes the right to allow others to use the property) on
a non-exclusive basis.
In
respect of the common property in a strata scheme, the Court considered that if
one unit owner permits a person to enter the common property to visit the owner’s
unit, that licence cannot be revoked by another owner.
But a unit owner cannot give a licence, irrevocable by another owner, which
is not reasonable and incidental to the right of the first owner to the possession
and use and enjoyment of the common property.
This position is subject to any by-laws of the strata scheme.
The case concerned a licence to enter.
Accordingly, the decision would appear to mean that, subject to the by-laws
of the strata scheme, an owner may permit his invitee to use the common property,
but if the permission given to the invitee is not reasonable and incidental to the
owner’s proper use of the common property, the licence may be revoked by another
owner.
Author: Col Myers
Date: February,2010
- Home
- Our Firm
- Partners
- Expert Services
- Business and Estate Planning
- Introduction
- Business Asset Protection
- Business Sucession
- Business Growth
- Personal Asset Protection
- Tax & Revenue Law
- Wills & Estates
- Family and Relationships Law
- Property and Commercial Law
- Introduction
- Franchising & Intellectual Property
- Body Corporate Law
- Property & Development Law
- Management Rights
- Developers
- Sellers & Buyers
- Industry Association
- Media Resources
- Contact Us
